This is a test of web page composition in Google Chrome. I finally decided to download it. Chrome has a web page editor which was able to use to create the content up to this line, including the style settings, but it is peculiar in the way that save doesn't really save. It does keep a buffer of the edits so far, and between sessions up until you explicitly say delete, but it doesn't ask for a local or remote filename.
To get this back I had to cut and paste it into a file and read it into a browser in the usual way. The only thing I can gues is that is the way the editor is designed to work for security reasons, but it is not documented. I could understand that it wants you to use the DOCUMENTROOT of your web server, but it doesn't even say that, I know, I looked.
One of the exciting new features of the latest browsers is the ability to load a character
set through a URL. This gets a pre-compiled font that is requested from
the current web page. I reason that costs about as much as referencing and prsumably downloading
the DTD tht should be at the top of most web pages.
I was able to penetrate the first layer of the font conventions for the web by getting lists of supported fonts for various browsers and operatng systems, as you might imagine, not every font is supported everywhere and there are fonts that are not good for web pages. It is in fact at least as emotional a topic as your favorite editor. As an asside, Tea-Editor, the one I am using now is a good alternative to Good 'ol Emacs, which I tend to use because the WYSIWYG editors for the web play idiosyncratic games with content.
Because of the experience with a very pleasing Roman font in an editor I saw in Mandriva 2007, which I can't use because of a dead laptop battery that is expensive to replace, I am very ware of the emotional impact of typography on a reader and some considerable appreciation of why someone like Donald Knuth would pour his considerable mathematical skills into making fonts. They really do matter, as much as color.