<?xml version="1.0"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="entry.xsl"?>
<entry>
<title>November 17, 2005</title>

<extlink>
<mylink>index.xml</mylink>
<linktext>
Index file
</linktext>
</extlink>

<para id="p1">
<subtitle>Sony Music and Microsoft</subtitle>
<body>
It just so happens that a story about a corporate screw-up and the
vulnerability in people who are unaware, i.e. stupid, has come up.
This is a real classic about how imcompetance can create a real mess.
</body>
</para>

<para>
<body>
Sony Music has been putting software on its music CDs that when loaded
on a Microsoft Windows platform prevents the user from copying the
tracks on to that system. You Must either consent to install the protection
software in order to play tne CD or it is installed automatically. The trouble
is the software makes the system vulnerable to attack. I daon't know if the
is becasue to undoes protections that ship with Windows or in the most readily
available anti-virus anti-spy package. Anyway, Sony stopped shipping the
software and has even agreed to replace muisc CDs with the software on it.
</body>
</para>

<toplink></toplink>

<para id="p2">
<subtitle>Windows is vlunerable by design</subtitle>
<body>
It would be a coup if someone found an internal Microsoft memo confirming
my suspicion that Windows was designed intentionally to allow hackers
and viruses. This is not the idea that Intel and the NSA are in some kind
of scheme to secretly share private information on users' system. I think
that "push" technology is vulnerable by design and the Microsoft refuses
to lock down access to its systems, that would prevent most hacking,
viruses, spaming, and identity theft on Windows systems, because its
business plan allowed for its business partners to have access to Windows
platforms without the users' consent. The Law of Complexity applies here:
No matter what the stated aim, any system that gets sufficiently complex
gives advantages to large rich organizations and creates disadvantage
for individuals. Thus Corporate users of Windows who can afford firewalls
are much less vulnerable that home computer users who bought Windows
because they are idiots.
</body>
</para>

<para>
<body>
I use Linux and Mac OS X to access the Internet and I know that these
platforms are not invulnerable to attack, things ike buffer overuns and
denial of service attacks being the most common. New versions of these
systems are getting good enough so that someone who knows nothing about
computer security can install them out of the box and be reasonably
safe, much safer than the usual XP user. The other fact is that *nix
systems give you much more information that the typical Windoes system
where there is a conscous effort to keep the casual user in the dark. I
do have a couple of Windows installs, but I don't connect them to Internet
if I can avoid it. I have even gone so far as to boot from Linux on the
same box, get what I want from outside and put it on a fat32 partition
that is shared with Windows so that I can look at it offline.
</body>
</para>

<toplink></toplink>

</entry>
